I had been meaning to post this article for a while, and really was mulling over what I wanted to say about it.
There were a lot of things about DanCap that I had problems with, mostly related to trucking in touring productions instead of mounting long-lasting original Canadian casts (Jersey Boys not withstanding).
But they also were an important part of theatre in a post-SARS Toronto (which I didn’t realize had such a huge impact on the theatre business), and much like the whole Apple/Google situation, competition is always good for consumers.
For all of DanCap’s flaws, Mirvish’s monopoly has always been, and continues to be, far more worrying.
The article is full of interesting facts and behind the scenes tales, including the worrying point that the market is over-saturated for the number of people actually attending live theatre (despite the fact that it feels like there’s never anything worth going to see). However the article closes with the best point about the whole situation:
One insider, who had dealings with both Mirvish and Dan, says while they have profoundly different styles and personalities, the tragedy is Toronto audiences could have benefited from peaceful co-existence.
“David is extremely intelligent and extraordinarily gentle,” says the source. “He has a genuine love for the theatre. He wants these stories to resonate and have meaning… . Yes, Aubrey can be brash and abrasive. But he also cares deeply about the city and gets things done. Imagine what might’ve been had they joined forces.”
One cannot help but think how things could have been completely turned around had these two entrepreneurs set their differences aside and joined forces… Who knows? Maybe my friends would all be working right now?
If only Livent was still around.